Higher thresholds
Reduce dependence on small signer groups for high-value operations.
22-of-33 High-Threshold Authorization
High-threshold post-quantum signing infrastructure for institutional digital assets.
Luvion is building an institutional signing control layer around a 22-of-33 threshold ML-DSA path, dynamic committee architecture, and self-healing network logic for high-value treasury, custody, and wallet workflows.
22-of-33
High-threshold signing architecture
ML-DSA
Post-quantum signing path
Recovery
Dynamic committees and self-healing design
Core distinction
22-of-33 authorization instead of low-threshold defaults
Cryptographic path
Threshold ML-DSA for long-horizon post-quantum migration
Operational design
Dynamic committee architecture and self-healing network logic
Current evidence
Implemented core, local demo, WAN demo, and review materials
Why Luvion
The authorization layer is where institutional risk concentrates.
Many high-value digital asset failures begin with weak authorization: compromised keys, low-threshold approvals, static signer sets, or unsafe transaction workflows. Luvion is designed to strengthen that layer for institutions operating stablecoin, RWA, custody, treasury, and wallet infrastructure.
Dynamic committees
Limit long-term exposure from fixed signer assignments.
Recovery logic
Support resilience under node churn and coordinator failure.
Migration path
Keep a long-term post-quantum signing roadmap in view.
Who it is for
Built for teams that carry institutional risk.
Luvion is relevant wherever high-value digital asset workflows depend on durable authorization, explicit policy, and integration-ready signing infrastructure.
Stronger treasury and custody control
For teams managing stablecoin, RWA, wallet, and treasury workflows that need authorization stronger than small static signer groups.
Clear technical depth
For investors, auditors, and protocol teams evaluating implementation evidence, architecture choices, and delivery readiness.
Integration-first collaboration
For chains and infrastructure partners exploring how threshold authorization can fit their transaction model and developer stack.
How it works
From policy to signature, without collapsing control into a few keys.
Define policy
Set the authorization threshold and operational rules for a high-value workflow.
Coordinate signers
Distribute approval across a larger committee instead of relying on a small fixed set.
Recover safely
Design for churn, failure, and coordinator loss without surrendering the security model.
Integrate on-chain
Map the authorization layer into chain-specific transaction flows, beginning with Sui validation.
Current status
Serious enough to inspect. Early enough to be precise.
Luvion should earn trust by separating what is already demonstrated from what is still being built. That honesty is especially important for institutions, technical partners, and investors.
- Implemented Rust-based 22-of-33 threshold ML-DSA core, local demo, and WAN demo evidence.
- In progress Production DKG, authenticated transport, Sui Move/PTB integration, audit readiness, and pilots.
- Not claimed No completed audit, no production deployment, and no claim of finished post-quantum institutional rollout.
- Best next read Start with the Company OnePager, then the Technical Summary, then the Sui Integration Plan.
Documents
Public technical materials.
OnePager
Company OnePager
Public overview of Luvion, its positioning, target users, and current stage.
Litepaper
Luvion Litepaper
Public technical overview of the protocol, scope, and integration direction.
Technical
Technical Summary
Protocol architecture, current implementation, and engineering evidence.
Sui
Sui Integration Plan
Compatibility path, technical boundaries, and validation direction.
Contact
For technical review, pilots, and ecosystem conversations.
Luvion is currently open to technical feedback, pilot discussions, and conversations with institutions working on stablecoins, RWA, custody, payment infrastructure, wallets, and protocol treasury security.