Signer concentration
Low-threshold multisigs can still fail when a small set of signers, devices, or workflows are compromised.
Institutional authorization layer
Luvion
Decentralized high-threshold MPC authorization for institutional digital asset operations.
Why now
The key is not only where assets are stored. It is who can authorize movement.
Recent incidents keep pointing to the same operational gap: private-key custody, multisig UI, and smart-contract admin rights are not enough when authorization itself lacks strong separation, threshold discipline, and reviewable evidence.
Opaque approval context
A signature alone often does not prove whether the underlying request, policy, committee, and risk path were valid.
Admin action risk
Mint, upgrade, treasury, bridge, and emergency controls need stronger authorization than ordinary wallet transfers.
Product surface
From protocol core to an integration layer for institutional teams.
The current implementation supports technical review of the core threshold-signing path. The product surface is being shaped as SDK/API integration, signing-session orchestration, and evidence export for design partners.
Authorization infrastructure, not another wallet interface.
Luvion is aimed at teams that already operate treasuries, protocol admin keys, bridges, mint/burn roles, or institutional digital asset workflows and need stronger authorization before execution.
- SDK / APIStructured authorization requests for teams that want to embed Luvion into existing operations.
- Session engineHigh-threshold committee participation, challenge generation, partial responses, aggregation, and verification.
- Evidence packageReadable records of request context, policy path, committee participation, and final signing result.
- Integration pathSui-first MVP is in progress; the market scope remains broader institutional digital asset operations.
Build with Luvion
A developer-facing path for high-threshold authorization flows.
The website should make the technical path visible: what to build, what to review, and what is not production-ready yet. This mirrors the clarity of mature protocol companies without overstating Luvion's stage.
Luvion Core
Rust protocol core for threshold ML-DSA signing, DKG/VSS, resharing, view change, and orchestration review.
Luvion Sessions
Product layer for turning treasury, mint, upgrade, and bridge actions into policy-bound signing sessions.
Luvion Evidence
Readable output for operators, auditors, and investors: request context, committee path, and verification result.
Luvion SDK
Planned integration surface for teams that want to embed authorization requests into existing workflows.
Sui Adapter
In-progress MVP path for Sui-first integration while the market scope remains broader than one ecosystem.
Protocol shape
Luvion turns critical operations into policy-bound signing sessions.
Instead of treating authorization as a final click, Luvion models each high-value action as a session with request data, policy checks, decentralized committee participation, threshold signing, and audit-ready output.
Request
A treasury transfer, mint, upgrade, or bridge action enters as a structured authorization request.
Policy
The request is checked against context such as asset type, destination, amount, role, and operational intent.
Committee
Signing power is distributed across a high-threshold participant set rather than a small static signer group.
Evidence
The output is designed to explain what was authorized, by which committee path, and under which policy conditions.
System view
Decentralized authorization before execution.
Luvion is not positioned as another consumer wallet. The first product direction is an infrastructure layer for teams that already manage valuable on-chain operations and need a stronger authorization primitive.
Structured critical action enters Luvion before execution.
Amount, role, destination, asset, and operation intent are checked.
Authorization is distributed across a high-threshold participant set.
Partial responses are aggregated into a verifiable threshold signature.
The session creates a reviewable authorization record.
Approved operation can move to the target chain or system path.
Architecture
One authorization layer, multiple operational entry points.
The architecture story should be explicit: where requests enter, where policy is evaluated, where committee signing happens, and what evidence leaves the system.
InputTreasury transfer
InputProtocol upgrade
InputMint or burn
Luvion session
Policy-bound high-threshold MPC authorization
OutputThreshold signature
OutputSession proof package
OutputAudit-readable trace
Initial use cases
Built for the operations where a bad signature is catastrophic.
The first design-partner conversations should focus on institutional workflows where security budgets already exist and where decision evidence matters.
A
Treasury transfer approval
A foundation or protocol team requires stronger authorization before moving treasury assets to a new destination.
B
Stablecoin mint / burn control
An issuer needs mint and burn actions to pass a higher-threshold authorization path with reviewable evidence.
C
Protocol upgrade authorization
A ProxyAdmin or security committee action should require stronger separation than a small signer set.
D
Bridge operator key rotation
Validator, operator, or route changes can be treated as high-risk sessions before the execution path is touched.
Demo
The current demo proves the core signing path, not production custody.
For technical and investor review, the local demo shows a full request-to-verification flow in a deterministic environment. It is useful for proving protocol mechanics, not for making a production security claim.
- inputnew high-value authorization request
- round 1participants create commitments
- challengecoordinator binds public key, commitment, and message
- round 2accepted partial responses are aggregated
- resultthreshold signature verifies successfully
Review boundary
Request demo materials
Available for qualified review.
The demo uses synthetic local shares and a pre-audit codebase. External security review and production hardening remain required before deployment.
Docs and review
Give developers and investors a clear next step.
Until the SDK/API is production-ready, the public path should be honest: read the code, review the whitepaper, request demo materials, and talk to the team about pilot scope.
Read the core repo
Implementation status, security boundary, and runnable demo live in the protocol repository.
Review the deck
Investor-facing context for problem, market, product direction, current stage, and funding path.
Request demo materials
Qualified reviewers can request the demo video, technical notes, and pilot discussion materials.
Follow updates
Short product updates, incident analysis, and technical progress will be published through X.
Current stage
Prototype first. Audit next. Pilots with the right partners.
We keep the public claims precise: Luvion has a running core protocol demo, is not yet production or audited, and is moving toward a Sui-first MVP and external security review.
Core protocol demo
A local deterministic demonstration of the high-threshold signing path for investor and technical review.
Whitepaper-code mapping
Core modules map to signing, Lagrange logic, DKG/VSS, resharing, view change, orchestration, and network facades.
Sui-first MVP integration
The first productized path is being shaped around critical digital asset operations rather than consumer wallet traffic.
External security review
Formal review is part of the financing plan before any production security claim is made.
Pre-audit, non-production
No third-party audit, production deployment, or ECDSA/secp256k1 backend claim is made at this stage.
Go-to-market
Start with technical design partners, then expand through security-reviewed deployments.
The commercial path is B2B: design-partner pilots, SDK/API integration, enterprise support, and security-driven deployment support for teams managing valuable digital asset workflows.
Design partners
Teams with real treasury, admin, bridge, or mint/burn authorization pain points.
Security reviewers
Security reviewers who can validate the cryptographic design, implementation assumptions, and review scope.
Ecosystem integrators
Infrastructure teams that can help turn the core protocol into practical deployment paths across institutional workflows.