Treasury transfer
A foundation, DAO, or protocol team needs a safer approval path before moving large treasury balances to a new address.
Luvion authorization layer
Luvion
Decentralized high-threshold MPC authorization layer for institutional digital asset operations.
Built for treasury transfers, protocol admin actions, mint/burn controls, bridge operations, and custody workflows before execution.
Customer scenarios
The risky moment is not storage. It is the moment someone is allowed to act.
Luvion is aimed at teams that already manage valuable on-chain operations and need stronger authorization before funds move, contracts change, tokens mint, or bridge routes execute.
Protocol upgrade
A ProxyAdmin, owner role, or emergency control should require stronger authorization than a small signer group.
Mint, bridge, or custody action
Mint/burn, bridge operator changes, route updates, and custody operations need clear policy context and evidence.
Product surface
Luvion sits before the final signature.
Customers do not need another dashboard first. They need a stronger authorization layer that can be inserted before existing wallets, Safe-style workflows, custody operations, protocol admin scripts, or chain adapters.
Existing tool requests action. Luvion verifies authorization. Execution proceeds only after threshold approval.
The first product path is B2B infrastructure: SDK/API, authorization sessions, committee signing, and evidence export for teams already operating valuable digital asset workflows.
- SDK / APITeams submit a structured authorization request from their existing treasury, admin, or operations workflow.
- Policy layerAmount, role, destination, contract action, asset type, and risk level are bound to the signing session.
- Committee signingA high-threshold participant set approves the action before a final signature or execution path is released.
- Evidence exportThe session produces a readable record for internal review, investor diligence, audit, and security response.
Pilot path
A lightweight pilot can start before full production integration.
For early design partners, the practical goal is not to replace their current stack. It is to map one real high-risk workflow, simulate the authorization path, and produce a clear pilot report.
Choose one workflow
Treasury transfer, protocol upgrade, mint/burn control, bridge operation, or custody approval.
Define policy context
Amount, asset, destination, role, required threshold, committee scope, and review evidence.
Run simulated session
Use the current core demo to model request, committee response, aggregation, and verification.
Deliver evidence package
Show what was requested, who participated, what threshold was reached, and what result was verified.
Decide integration path
SDK/API integration, chain adapter, custody workflow, or product partnership if the pilot is useful.
Workflow
Every high-risk action becomes a reviewable authorization session.
The product story is simple for customers: before execution, Luvion asks what action is being approved, which policy applies, which committee approved it, and what evidence remains afterward.
Request
A treasury transfer, mint, upgrade, or bridge action enters as a structured authorization request.
Policy
The request is checked against context such as asset type, destination, amount, role, and operational intent.
Committee
Signing power is distributed across a high-threshold participant set rather than a small static signer group.
Evidence
The output is designed to explain what was authorized, by which committee path, and under which policy conditions.
System view
Decentralized authorization for operations that should never depend on one weak path.
Luvion is not positioned as another consumer wallet. It is an authorization layer for operators that already manage treasuries, protocol permissions, custody flows, bridges, and institutional asset movement.
Structured critical action enters Luvion before execution.
Amount, role, destination, asset, and operation intent are checked.
Authorization is distributed across a high-threshold participant set.
Partial responses are aggregated into a verifiable threshold signature.
The session creates a reviewable authorization record.
Approved operation can move to the target chain or system path.
Architecture
One authorization layer, multiple operational entry points.
The architecture story should be explicit: where requests enter, where policy is evaluated, where committee signing happens, and what evidence leaves the system.
InputTreasury transfer
InputProtocol upgrade
InputMint or burn
Luvion session
Policy-bound high-threshold MPC authorization
OutputThreshold signature
OutputSession proof package
OutputAudit-readable trace
Initial use cases
Built for teams whose operational mistakes can become market events.
The best early customers are not consumers. They are teams with admin keys, treasury balances, protocol controls, custody processes, and security budgets.
A
Treasury transfer approval
A foundation or protocol team requires stronger authorization before moving treasury assets to a new destination.
B
Stablecoin mint / burn control
An issuer needs mint and burn actions to pass a higher-threshold authorization path with reviewable evidence.
C
Protocol upgrade authorization
A ProxyAdmin or security committee action should require stronger separation than a small signer set.
D
Bridge operator key rotation
Validator, operator, or route changes can be treated as high-risk sessions before the execution path is touched.
Demo
The current demo proves the core signing path, not production custody.
For technical and investor review, the local demo shows a full request-to-verification flow in a deterministic environment. It is useful for proving protocol mechanics, not for making a production security claim.
- inputnew high-value authorization request
- round 1participants create commitments
- challengecoordinator binds public key, commitment, and message
- round 2accepted partial responses are aggregated
- resultthreshold signature verifies successfully
Review boundary
Request demo materials
Available for qualified review.
The demo uses synthetic local shares and a pre-audit codebase. External security review and production hardening remain required before deployment.
Docs and review
Give developers and investors a clear next step.
Until the SDK/API is production-ready, the public path should be honest: read the code, review the whitepaper, request demo materials, and talk to the team about pilot scope.
Public technical overview
Public boundary, current status, and review notes are available without exposing the private core implementation.
Request investor deck
The full financing deck is shared selectively with investors and strategic partners after initial contact.
Request demo materials
Qualified reviewers can request the demo video, technical notes, and pilot discussion materials.
Follow updates
Short product updates, incident analysis, and technical progress will be published through X.
Current stage
Prototype first. Audit next. Pilots with the right partners.
We keep the public claims precise: Luvion has a running core protocol demo, is not yet production or audited, and is moving toward design-partner pilots plus external security review.
Core protocol demo
A local deterministic demonstration of the high-threshold signing path for investor and technical review.
Whitepaper-code mapping
Core modules map to signing, Lagrange logic, DKG/VSS, resharing, view change, orchestration, and network facades.
SDK/API and adapter path
The first productized path is being shaped around critical digital asset operations rather than consumer wallet traffic.
External security review
Formal review is part of the financing plan before any production security claim is made.
Pre-audit, non-production
No third-party audit, production deployment, or ECDSA/secp256k1 backend claim is made at this stage.
Go-to-market
Start with technical design partners, then expand through security-reviewed deployments.
The commercial path is B2B: design-partner pilots, SDK/API integration, enterprise support, and security-driven deployment support for teams managing valuable digital asset workflows.
Design partners
Teams with real treasury, admin, bridge, or mint/burn authorization pain points.
Security reviewers
Security reviewers who can validate the cryptographic design, implementation assumptions, and review scope.
Ecosystem integrators
Infrastructure teams that can help turn the core protocol into practical deployment paths across institutional workflows.